Patient privacy court ruling would interfere with care

| 1 Min Read

Physicians are petitioning a state supreme court to hear a previously decided case that holds patient care in the balance by making patients’ personal prescription data too widely available. 

Scales of Justice on wooden table, courtroom blurred in the background

In Lewis v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California), a lower court ruling grants law enforcement and other government employees broad access to the state’s prescription drug monitoring program’s database. Physicians are flagging the ruling as a violation of confidentiality in the physician-patient relationship.

“The duty of physicians to protect patient privacy lies at the very core of the medical profession,” the Litigation Center of the AMA and State Medical Societies and the California Medical Association stated in a petition submitted to the California Supreme Court last week.

“Confidentiality is one of the most enduring ethical tenets in the practice of medicine, and is essential to the patient-physician relationship,” the petition continues. “It is the cornerstone of the patient’s trust [and is key to] successful medical information gathering for accurate diagnosis and treatment, an effective physician-patient relationship, good medicine and quality care.”

The petition also points to the importance of this case because it deals both with fundamental elements of patient care and with the issue of personal privacy in the digital era. 

FEATURED STORIES

Doctor with text bubbles and graphic elements

Deepfake “doctors” are a problem—here are 7 keys to stopping them

| 4 Min Read
Light bulb with

How to bring physician well-being initiatives to life

| 14 Min Read
Healthcare worker in empty hospital operating room

These physician specialties score highest on resident well-being

| 11 Min Read
Train passenger distressed by motion sickness

What doctors want patients to know about motion sickness

| 10 Min Read