Oral arguments begin in patient safety case before U.S. Supreme Court

| 1 Min Read

The nation’s highest court Tuesday will hear arguments in a case that will decide whether the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can second-guess the work of state medical licensure boards.

Thumbnail

The Supreme Court of the United States is hearing oral arguments in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, a case previously decided by a federal appeals court that ruled in favor of the FTC’s claim that state licensure boards should be subject to federal antitrust laws. The decision of the appeals court could effectively limit the ability of these boards to regulate their health care professions and shield patients from unlawful practices.

The AMA and other health care organizations filed an amicus brief expressing support for the plaintiffs in this case, stating fear that if the court ruled for the FTC, it would have a chilling effect on state medical and dental boards to the detriment of public health.

In June, physicians at the open forum of the Litigation Center of the AMA and State Medical Societies heard both sides of the case argued in a mock court session

FEATURED STORIES

Folding rulers in shape of a stock curve

Is your physician well-being strategy working? 9 things to know

| 16 Min Read
Figure sits on a stack of books alongside health data

This doctor shares why physicians can make great entrepreneurs

| 7 Min Read
Military veteran speaking with another individual

Accelerated PTSD care offers faster relief for veterans

| 7 Min Read
David Purow, MD, featured on "Health vs. Hype" AMA podcast

5 things patients should know about detoxing

| 5 Min Read