Ethics

Ethics in pathology: Images, the media and diagnosis

. 3 MIN READ
By
Troy Parks , News Writer

When Prince died in April, details of his death and autopsy slowly trickled into the public sphere, but isn’t patient health information private? Examine this and other complex ethical questions that pathologists face in practice and how media and publicity can complicate these matters even more.

The August issue of the AMA Journal of Ethics® considers neglected ethical issues in pathology practice, including shifts in social and cultural attitudes toward autopsy, cautions about the use of social media for sharing images, how to communicate about errors or pathology results and what the death of Prince tells us about the public and professional obligations of physicians who interact with the media. Articles featured in this issue include:

  • Public figures, professional ethics, and the media.” If health information is private, why does the public know so much about Prince’s death? Death certificates and autopsy reports contain personal information protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Examine the critical ethical questions that have not yet been settled about whether and when this information should be made public.

In the journal’s August podcast, Theonia Boyd, MD, associate professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School, discusses ethical issues pathologists face when conducting autopsies and obtaining specimens.

Give your answer to this month’s poll: When communicating about errors—whether to clinicians or patients—what should pathologists say to help conversations about errors go smoothly?

The journal’s editorial focus is on commentaries and articles that offer practical advice and insights for medical students and physicians. Submit your work for publication.

FEATURED STORIES