What’s wrong with Medicare physician payment?

For the last five years, the U.S. Congress has failed to stop in their entirety repeated across-the-board pay cuts that further threaten Medicare access to high-quality physician care, especially for patients in rural, underserved or economically marginalized areas. This year, it was a 2.8% pay cut that took effect. 

Recently, Sen. Roger Marshall, MD (R-Kan.), introduced the Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act (S. 1640), which is companion legislation to H.R. 879 that was introduced earlier this year by Reps. Greg Murphy, MD (R-N.C.) and Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.).  

This legislation, if passed, would temporarily reverse the damaging 2.8% cut and provide a much-needed 2% positive payment update. This will help stabilize physician practices and protect patients' access to care. Please join the thousands of physicians from across the country who have already taken action on this bill. Contact your senators and urge them to co-sponsor the Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act today.

While the AMA is working relentlessly to build understanding on Capitol Hill about the unsustainable path the Medicare payment system is on, preventing further cuts means getting to the root causes of what’s wrong with Medicare physician payment. 

That is why the AMA created the Medicare Basics series, which provides an in-depth look at important aspects of the Medicare physician payment system. With these six straightforward explainers, policymakers and physician advocates can learn about key elements of the payment system and why they are in need of reform. 

1. Medicare physician payment adequacy—Budget neutrality

   1. As one of the few Medicare providers without a payment update tied to inflation, physicians have seen their inflation-adjusted payments fall by 33% since 2001. Physician payments are further eroded by frequent and large payment redistributions caused by budget-neutrality adjustments.

2. Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

   1. Although MIPS is well-intentioned, its reporting requirements are burdensome to physician practices and often appear to be clinically irrelevant. Congress must step in and act to prevent unsustainable penalties, invest in and enable the move to value-based care, and increase transparency and oversight in the program. Read more about how MIPS is broken and must be replaced.

3. The Medicare Economic Index (MEI)

   1. Since 1992, the role of the MEI in shaping Medicare physician payment has diminished dramatically, first under the sustainable-growth rate (SGR) and then under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015. Physicians need an annual inflationary update, which will allow practices to better absorb other payment redistributions triggered by budget neutrality rules and performance adjustments, as well as periods of high inflation and rising staffing costs.

4. Advancing value-based care with alternative payment models

   1. Alternative payment models (APMs) are a key approach to achieving value-based care by providing incentive payments to deliver high-quality and cost-efficient care for a clinical condition, a care episode or a patient population.

5. Transitioning to value-based care: Clinical data registries

   1. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) clinical data registry approval process under the MIPS program is complex and cumbersome, and the lack of accessible cost data inhibits progress toward true value-based care. As a result, physicians’ ability to leverage their participation in these quality improvement efforts for MIPS and engage in continuous learning has been limited.

6. MIPS data problems

   1. Value-based care relies on data. To be successful, physicians in MIPS need access to a wide range of information on a timely basis to understand gaps in care and identify opportunities to improve health outcomes, reduce variations in care delivery or eliminate avoidable services—all steps that can lower costs for patients and the Medicare program.

The AMA is leading the charge to reform the Medicare payment system.

Dive deeper to learn how Medicare pay cuts:

• Endanger physician practices.
• Threaten patients’ access to care.
• Especially affect rural America.
• Hit solo physician practices hard.
• Put even big medical groups at risk.

Visit AMA Advocacy in Action to find out what’s at stake in reforming Medicare payment and other advocacy priorities the AMA is actively working on.

Follow the fight for Medicare reform

Stay up to date on how the AMA is fighting to reform the Medicare payment system for physicians—delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe Now