Man digging through file cabinets for documents.
·
3 Min Read

Court rules patient-safety info subject to litigation discovery

Court decides that medical incident reports used for patient-safety improvements are not protected from disclosure in medical liability cases.

Judicial Advocacy
Judge behind bench banging his gavel.
·
3 Min Read

Fighting together, physicians foil insurance Goliaths

Federal judges block both insurer megamergers capping 18 months of physician efforts that paid off.

series
Leadership
Leadership Viewpoints
·
4 Min Read

Jan. 26, 2017: Judicial Advocacy Update

Learn more about the scope of practice case which medical professionals are qualified to testify, setting limits on medical liability testimony.

Advocacy Update
·
3 Min Read

Scope of practice should set limits on medical liability testimony

Can an advanced registered nurse practitioner provide medical causation testimony? The Supreme Court of Washington will decide.

Judicial Advocacy
·
5 Min Read

Jan. 12, 2017: Judicial Advocacy Update

Learn more about the AMA's role in cases about patient-psychiatrist confidentiality, interstate medical liability and more.

Advocacy Update
Patient has private conversation with psychiatrist.
·
5 Min Read

Patient-psychiatrist confidentiality hampered in liability ruling

Washington court rules psychiatrists responsible for alerting targets of patient violence, even without a clear indication that foul play will occur.

Judicial Advocacy
·
4 Min Read

Case threatens limit on interstate medical liability exposure

When a patient crosses state lines seeking treatment and then suffers complications or death, which state holds jurisdiction over the physician involved?

Judicial Advocacy
Best of 2016: Litigation
·
3 Min Read

Litigation: These court cases got readers’ attention

Notable litigation this year involved tussles over expert testimony, clinical judgment, informed consent and exam-room censorship.

Judicial Advocacy
·
4 Min Read

Judgment on life expectancy at issue in Medicare fraud case

The case concerns qualifying a patient’s care under the Medicare hospice benefit. At issue is a physicians’ ability to exercise their clinical judgment in certifying a patient’s life expectancy is less than six months.

Judicial Advocacy