Sustainability

Does the number of vital signs recorded affect billing?

Get real answers from the AMA to common myths about the impact of vital signs on level of service billed.

Updated | 3 Min Read
Debunking Regulatory Myths-series only

This resource is part of the AMA's Debunking Regulatory Myths series, supporting AMA's practice transformation efforts to provide physicians and their care teams with resources to reduce guesswork and administrative burdens.

 

 


Debunking the myth

In light of the 2021 changes to the outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) coding requirements, the number of vital signs recorded during a patient visit no longer impacts the level of service which may be billed.

We want to hear from you!

Background

In 2021, significant changes to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) Evaluation and Management (E/M) codes went into effect. With the previous standards from 1995 and 1997, there were three main components that contributed to determining the appropriate level of service (LOS): history, examination, and medical decision-making (MDM). For vital signs to count as part of the examination component, three out of seven vital signs had to be recorded. 

The 2021 E/M services guidelines were designed to streamline documentation and reduce clinically irrelevant documentation burdens for physicians. This upgrade affects all outpatient visit E/M LOS billing standards. The guidelines provide that documentation for coding and billing purposes be based on either the level of MDM alone or the total amount of time spent providing care for the patient on the day of the visit (including before and after the visit, not just face-to-face time). In other words, determination of the appropriate LOS no longer depends on the breadth of documented history and examination. 

Takeaway

The number of vital signs recorded during an outpatient visit does not impact the LOS which may be billed. Only the medically necessary and appropriate history and examination should be included, thus reducing documentation burden.

Reducing Regulatory Burden Playbook

Avoid overinterpreting the rules! This AMA STEPS Forward® playbook is your roadmap to practice efficiency.

Resources

References

  1. AMA STEPS Forward®. Simplified Outpatient Documentation and Coding Toolkit. Published online August 2022. Accessed July 6, 2023. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/ama-steps-forward/simplified-outpatient-documentation-and-coding-toolkit

​​​​​​Debunking Regulatory Myths overview

Visit the overview page for information on additional myths.

Vital signs regulatory myth

Does the number of vital signs recorded affect billing?


Disclaimer: The AMA's Debunking Regulatory Myths (DRM) series is intended to convey general information only, based on guidance issued by applicable regulatory agencies, and not to provide legal advice or opinions. The contents within DRM should not be construed as, and should not be relied upon for, legal advice in any particular circumstance or fact situation. An attorney should be contacted for advice on specific legal issues. Additionally, all applicable laws and accreditation standards should be considered when applying information to your own practice.

FEATURED STORIES

Abe Sutton, JD, CMS director, on the AMA Moving Medicine video podcast

New voluntary CMS pay model encourages use of health tech

| 5 Min Read
Young adult in a telehealth appointment

New data details how telehealth use varies by physician specialty

| 4 Min Read
Mom holding baby gets medicine from doctor

The AMA is committed to reversing the maternal mortality crisis

| 5 Min Read
Young child  holding throat with pained expression

What doctors wish patients knew about strep throat

| 11 Min Read