U.S. appellate court upholds Kentucky law requiring women to view ultrasound before abortion, contradicts earlier ruling on North Carolina’s similar law.

Why the Supreme Court should take up Title X gag rule case in the latest Judicial Advocacy Update.

Physicians urge U.S. Supreme Court to follow half century of precedent to protect constitutional right to access reproductive health care.

New positions address telehealth confidentiality, medical student training and prescription drug monitoring programs.

The AMA and leaders across medicine filed a lawsuit to block the Administration’s rule that would decimate the Title X program and limit the medical advice physicians can give their patients.

Genetic testing can provide valuable information to support informed decision making about personal health care options as well as reproductive choices.

Find out how the AMA advocates for pregnant women and their right to informed consent about their options in NIFLA v. Becerra.

Conflicting appellate court rulings on cases involving the HHS physician gag rule require resolution by the Supreme Court, which should strike it down.

In new amicus brief, leading medical organizations urge appeals court to affirm ruling invalidating Texas SB8

Ruling allows HHS to move ahead with a Trump administration rule that forces doctors to act as government mouthpieces when speaking with Title X program patients.