A federal district court sides with the AMA and issues a preliminary injunction to block a state law that would undermine open, honest patient-physician conversations.

Learn more about the AMA Litigation Center's support on cases good-faith clinical decisions and abortion rights to unaccompanied migrant minors.

The AMA is deeply disappointed by U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to stop this egregious ban from taking effect, endangering patients’ access to care.

Two North Dakota legal provisions turn physicians into mouthpieces for politically motivated messages that could harm patients. The AMA is suing to overturn them.

Physicians urge U.S. Supreme Court to follow half century of precedent to protect constitutional right to access reproductive health care.

The proposed regulation affecting Title X providers would interfere with the patient-physician relationship and deprive patients of information on the full range of family-planning options.

AMA deeply disturbed by Supreme Court’s decision to overturn nearly a half century of precedent protecting patients’ right to critical reproductive health care.

Why leaked abortion opinion is “antithetical to public health” and more in the latest Judicial Advocacy Update.

AMA filed comments to the HHS to express concerns about proposed regulatory changes to Title X.

Why the Supreme Court should take up Title X gag rule case in the latest Judicial Advocacy Update.