Advocacy With Congress
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a comprehensive health system reform law that will increase health insurance coverage substantially for the uninsured and implement long overdue reforms to the health insurance market. The new law includes many major provisions that are consistent with AMA policy and hold the potential for a stronger, better performing health care system. While the ACA represents a tremendous step forward on the path toward meaningful health system reform, it is not the last step, but rather the beginning.
The AMA is continuing to work with Congress and the Administration to refine certain provisions in the ACA.
Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)
The Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB, is a federal panel created under the Affordable Care Act to make payment and policy decisions that could adversely affect access to health care for millions of Medicare patients. Similar to the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula permanently repealed in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, the IPAB would rely solely on arbitrary payment cuts to reduce Medicare spending. Medicare spending growth has slowed in recent years, so the panel has not yet been appointed, and the threat of cuts has not yet materialized. Congress has also taken action each year to rescind funding for the IPAB to begin its work, most recently in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016. Nonetheless, Medicare has repeatedly estimated that spending will grow in future years and trigger the need for across-the-board provider cuts by the IPAB. So the AMA continues to strongly support permanent repeal of the IPAB.
On June 23, 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 1190, the “Protecting Seniors’ Access to Medicare Act,” which would repeal the IPAB. The legislation was sponsored by Representatives Phil Roe, MD (R-TN) and Linda Sanchez (D-CA), and was adopted by a vote of 244 to 154. Unfortunately, the final version of H.R. 1190 would offset the cost of the legislation by cutting more than $7 billion in public health and prevention funding. So the AMA will work to replace those cuts with more appropriate offsets. The AMA is also working with Senator John Cornyn (R-TX), the sponsor of companion legislation in the U.S. Senate, S. 141, and others to secure final passage of IPAB repeal legislation and to ensure that seniors will continue to have access to their physicians.
Passage of H.R. 1725, the "National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2015" (NASPER 2015) and full appropriations is urgently needed to ensure that physicians across the country have a critical tool at the point-of-care to combat prescription drug abuse while ensuring patients with legitimate need of pain management continue to have access. Unfortunately, the appropriations to fully fund, modernize, and optimize NASPER prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have not kept pace with the rapid escalation in abuse and diversion of prescription drugs. Fully-funded PDMPs would provide more physicians with access to reliable, real-time information about prescriptions patients have obtained (and filled) from other prescribers, particularly controlled substances.
In a January 7, 2014 letter, Dr. Stack responded to additional questions stemming from the November 2013 House Energy and Commerce Hearing: “Examining Public Health Legislation to Help Local Communities”
AMA urged immediate passage of H.R. 3528 (NASPER 2013) and full appropriations with a strong emphasis on the public health focus of NASPER in a November 2013 statement to the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
More than 11 million seniors, or 26.9% of the Medicare population, have diabetes and half of all seniors over age 65 have pre-diabetes. In addition, one in every three Medicare dollars is spent on diabetes and its complications. Spending on Medicare beneficiaries with prediabetes and diabetes is estimated to be more than $2 trillion over the next 10 years, including $1.7 trillion in federal spending. Interventions targeted at preventing or delaying the onset of serious and debilitating illnesses like diabetes must be a national priority because diabetes is a costly and devastating disease that places people at high risk for severe complications and other chronic diseases. With access to appropriate intervention and information, diabetes can be prevented, even for those at the highest risk. As part of the AMA's Improving Health Outcomes initiative, the AMA is committing its resources, expertise, and reach to prevent type 2 diabetes and to improve outcomes for those suffering from this disease. As part of this initiative, the AMA is collaborating with the YMCA to increase physician referrals to its program, which is part of the CDC's National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP).
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced S. 586, the "National Diabetes Clinical Care Commission Act," on February 26, 2015. H.R. 1192, the companion bill, was introduced in the House by Rep. Pete Olson (R-TX) on March 2, 2015. The legislation would create a Commission that will focus on improving diabetes care delivery, patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. The AMA joined the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and other groups in supporting this legislation.
On April 29, 2015, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) and Rep. Susan Davis (D-CA) introduced the "Medicare Diabetes Prevention Act of 2015" (S. 1131/H.R. 2102), a bipartisan bill which would provide coverage for the National Diabetes Prevention Program under the Medicare program. The National Diabetes Prevention Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is a public-private partnership that provides low-cost, evidence-based community programs to prevent diabetes. Providing Medicare coverage for the National Diabetes Prevention Program will help seniors avoid diabetes and other chronic illnesses. The AMA joined the American Diabetes Association and others from the medical community in expressing its support for this legislation.
H.R. 2126, the "Cutting Costly Codes Act of 2015," was introduced by Representative Ted Poe (R-TX) on April 30, 2015. This legislation would prohibit the Secretary of HHS from replacing the current International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) with the ICD-10 diagnostic code set. In addition, it would require the GAO, in consultation with stakeholders, to conduct a study on ways to mitigate the disruption on health care providers resulting from a replacement of ICD-9 with ICD-10. The current deadline for implementation of ICD-10 is October 1, 2015.
Physicians are overwhelmed with the prospect of the tremendous administrative and financial burdens of transitioning to ICD-10. ICD-10 consists of 68,000 codes -- a five-fold increase from the approximately 13,000 diagnosis codes currently in ICD-9. Implementation of ICD-10 will affect physician claims submission and most business processes within a physician’s practice, including verifying patient eligibility, obtaining pre-authorization for services, documentation of the patient’s visit, research activities, public health reporting, and quality reporting. As HIPAA-covered entities, physicians will be responsible for complying with this ICD-10 mandate, and therefore will bear the entire cost of such a transition. Furthermore, physicians face the prospect of significant disruption in claims processing and payment during the transition to ICD-10 and any physician who is unable to transition to ICD-10 by the implementation date simply will not get paid.
The AMA strongly supports this legislation and continues to seek repeal of ICD-10.
The AMA believes that all physicians seeing Medicaid patients should be paid at least the Medicare rate to ensure adequate access.
Research studies have demonstrated that low Medicaid reimbursement rates can significantly affect a physician’s ability to accept new Medicaid patients into his or her practice. Congress has recognized that low provider participation in Medicaid can negatively affect access to health care, and took action to increase Medicaid payments for certain primary care services to be not less than the Medicare payment rates for 2013 and 2014.
On July 30, 2014, Senators Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Patty Murray (D-WA) introduced S. 2694, the “Ensuring Access to Primary Care for Women and Children Act.” This legislation would extend the application of the Medicare payment rate floor to primary care services provided by primary care physicians under the Medicaid program beyond 2014, when the enhanced payment rate is scheduled to expire under current law. AMA supports this legislation.
In addition, Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) introduced H.R. 5723, the "Ensuring Access to Primary Care for Women and Children Act," on November 17, 2014. This legislation would extend Medicaid payment rates under current law for certain primary care and immunization services to at least the level of Medicare through 2016. AMA supports this legislation.
The AMA strongly supports comprehensive medical liability reform (MLR), including reasonable limits on non-economic damages similar to successful reforms in California and Texas.
The "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (ACA) included multiple provisions concerning the establishment and implementation of national care and practice standards and guidelines for health care providers, with potential for new causes of legal action against physicians. The AMA believes physicians should not have to worry about potential new causes of action or liability exposure in their attempts to develop new ways to improve the quality and efficiencies of care.
On April 10, 2013, Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA), who has long been a proponent for MLR, introduced H.R. 1473, the "Standard of Care Protection Act of 2013." The companion bill, S. 1769 was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) on November 21, 2013. The Senate companion bill S. 1769 was introduced by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) on November 21, 2013. This legislation would clarify that the care standards and guidelines specified in the ACA Medicare and Medicaid statutes cannot be used to create new causes of legal action against physicians providing care to patients. In addition, it would preserve state medical liability laws. AMA supports H.R. 1473 and S. 1769. AMA supports H.R. 1473 and S. 1769.
Additionally, the AMA supports H.R. 865, the "Good Samaritan Health Professionals Act of 2015," which was introduced by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Rep. David Scott (D-GA) on February 11, 2015. This bipartisan legislation would help ensure that needed medical volunteers are not turned away due to confusion and uncertainty about the application of Good Samaritan laws, as was the case in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Liability insurance carriers do not typically provide coverage outside the state where a physician is licensed to practice. This means that physicians or other sports medicine professionals traveling with sports teams may not be covered when they provide care in another state. To remedy this problem, Rep. Tom Latham (R-IA) introduced H.R. 3722 on December 12, 2013, a bill to provide protection for sports medicine professionals, including physicians, who provide certain medical services in a secondary state. Its Senate companion bill was introduced by Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and John Thune (R-SD) on April 8, 2014. AMA supports this legislation.
H.R. 1650, the "Medicare Patient Empowerment Act of 2015," was introduced in the House by Congressman Tom Price (R-GA) on March 26, 2015. This legislation would allow seniors to see the physician of their choice (regardless of whether a participating or non-participating physician or practitioner), much like out-of-network options available to many with private health insurance plans. This greatly increases the likelihood that current beneficiaries and new Medicare enrollees will have access to care when and where they need it. The AMA strongly supports this legislation.
More information on this issue as well as a petition that physicians are encouraged to sign can be found at mymedicare-mychoice.org.
H.R. 2, the "Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA)," was signed into law by the President on April 16, 2015. It passed in the Senate by a vote of 92-8 on April 14, and passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 392-37 on March 26.
MACRA permanently repeals the flawed sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula that has threatened physicians with substantial cuts in Medicare payments for over a decade. MACRA improves current law in a number of ways that benefit physicians, in addition to stabilizing Medicare payments for physician services. The law replaces Medicare's multiple quality reporting programs with a new single "MIPS" program that makes it easier for physicians to earn rewards for providing high-quality, high-value health care. The law also supports and rewards physicians for participating in new payment and delivery models to improve the efficiency of care, while preserving fee-for-service as an option. However, we realize that this new law is not perfect. The AMA will continue working to achieve further improvements and reduce physicians' administrative burdens through additional changes in law, regulation, and other policies.
Recent Congressional testimony and correspondence
AMA’s letter to members of the three Congressional Medicare Committees outlining concerns with CMS’s proposal to restructure Medicare reimbursement for Part B drugs purchased and administered by physicians, April 13, 2016
Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX), introduced H.R. 2513, the “Promoting Access, Competition, and Equity Act of 2015 (PACE Act of 2015)” on May 21, 2015, which would allow certain physician-owned hospitals to expand their facilities and remain competitive, continue their solid record of providing the highest quality care to patients, and contribute significantly to the communities they serve. AMA strongly supports this legislation since existing legal restrictions on physician-owned hospitals put them at a competitive disadvantage, making it difficult for these care centers to respond to the health care needs of their local communities.
Initiatives to fight health care fraud, or to identify areas of waste, have a tangible impact on physician practices. To comply with anti-fraud rules and regulations, physicians proactively conduct internal audits and adopt compliance programs at their own cost. Broad-brush regulations that impose burdens on all providers, rather than focusing on those providers who have demonstrated a propensity to commit fraud or abuse, inequitably affect physicians who are good actors, and result in unnecessary costs to the health care system.
On June 29, 2012, the AMA responded to a request from the Senate Committee on Finance for input on waste, fraud, and abuse (or "program integrity") reforms. The AMA submitted a white paper that outlined the recommendations of the AMA for greater value and efficiency in program integrity efforts.
The AMA continues with efforts to address physician workforce shortages, including strongly supporting stable, adequate funding for graduate medical education (GME) training positions.
The Physician Payments Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act) was not passed to limit or construct additional barriers to the dissemination of new medical knowledge that improves patient health outcomes. The Sunshine Act was designed to promote transparency with regard to payments and other financial transfers of value between physicians and the medical product industry. However, as a result of the Sunshine Act, onerous and burdensome reporting obligations are being imposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that have already chilled the dissemination of medical textbooks, peer-reviewed medical reprints and journals.
On September 18, 2014, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) introduced H.R. 5539, a bill which would clarify that certain applicable manufacturer transfers of value to support independent medical educational programs, reprints, and medical textbooks are exempt from reporting under the Sunshine Act. The AMA and physician organizations representing both national medical specialty societies and state medical societies strongly support this legislation. Passage of this bill is urgently needed to remedy the unintended consequences that have chilled the exchange of timely independent medical information that benefits patients through improved clinical decision-making.
Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB)
On February 14, 2013, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced S. 351, the "Protecting Seniors' Access to Medicare Act of 2013," which would repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). Rep. Phil Roe, MD (R-TN) introduced this bill as H.R. 351 in the House with bipartisan support on January 25. The IPAB is a panel that puts significant health care payment and policy decisions in the hands of an independent body of individuals with far too little accountability, and could adversely affect access to health care for Medicare patients. Patients and physicians are still struggling with the frequent threat of drastic cuts from the broken SGR Medicare physician payment formula. IPAB would be another arbitrary system that relies solely on payment cuts in an attempt to reduce spending in Medicare. The AMA strongly supports this legislation and looks forward to working with members of the House and Senate to achieve its enactment.
Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs)
The AMA continues to urge Congress to take action to lift the Affordable Care Act's restrictions on tax-preferred accounts, such as health savings accounts, for over-the-counter medicines.
Existing legal restrictions on physician-owned hospitals put them at a competitive disadvantage, making it difficult for these care centers to respond to the health care needs of their local communities. AMA supports legislation that would allow physician-owned hospitals to expand and remain competitive, continue their solid record of providing the highest quality health care to patients, and contribute significantly to the communities they serve.
Section 2706(a), Non-Discrimination
On July 24, 2013, Rep. Andy Harris, (R-MD), introduced H.R. 2817 to repeal Section 2706(a), the “Non-Discrimination in Health Care Providers” provision of the Affordable Care Act. Section 2706(a) states that in making decisions about which providers can participate or will be covered under a health plan, an insurer may not discriminate against health care providers acting within their state scope of practice law. AMA supports repeal of Section 2706(a), as it represents federal intrusion into scope of practice, generally the province of state law and regulations.
The AMA continues to be concerned about increasing health plan consolidation, as well as the regulatory barriers that restrict physicians' ability to work together, and has made improving the antitrust environment for physicians a top priority. The AMA is actively supporting H.R. 1409, the "Quality Health Care Coalition Act of 2011," which was introduced by Representative John Conyers (D - MI). H.R. 1409 would allow health care professionals to jointly negotiate with health plans regarding terms that affect patient care, enabling physicians to advocate for quality care for their patients and reinforcing the patient-physician relationship.
HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act
On February 14, 2013, Senator Barbara Boxer introduced S. 330, the "HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act." This bipartisan legislation would serve to establish safeguards and standards of quality for research and transplantation of HIV-infected organs to HIV-positive recipients. It would also make important, common-sense reforms to current organ transplant law by repealing the current ban on organ donations from HIV-positive donors to HIV-positive recipients.
Hospital Observation Status
On March 14, Representative Joe Courtney (D-CT) introduced H.R. 1179, the "Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act of 2013." The companion bill, S. 569, was introduced in the Senate by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) on March 14, 2013. This legislation would require the time period of outpatient "observation" care in a hospital to be counted toward satisfying the three-day inpatient hospital requirements for coverage of skilled nursing facility services under Medicare. The AMA strongly supports this legislation.
Letter to Sen. Sherrod Brown supporting S. 569, the “Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act of 2013,” June 13, 2013
Letter to Reps. Courtney and Latham in support of H.R. 1179, the "Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act of 2013."
Indian Health Service
American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) suffer disproportionately from a variety of health afflictions, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and tuberculosis. Addressing the health disparities experienced in the AI/AN population is made more difficult by both the lack of adequate funding and the delays in such funding.
On October 1, 2013, Rep. Don Young (R-AK-At Large) introduced H.R. 3229, the “Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2013.” This legislation would allow the Indian Health Service and the Indian Health Facilities Accounts to receive advance appropriations which would allow tribal health administrators to continue to treat patients without worrying about if or when funding would be available due to underfunding, or delays in the enactment of annual appropriations legislation. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) introduced S. 1570, the Senate companion bill, on October 10, 2013.
Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records
In a May 17, 2013 letter, the AMA provided feedback on a health information technology (HIT) white paper entitled, “REBOOT: Re-Examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT,” which was authored by Senators John Thune (R-SD), Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Pat Roberts (R-KA), Richard Burr (R-NC), Tom Coburn, MD (R-OK), and Mike Enzi (R-WY).
The white paper outlines several concerns with the Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) program, focusing extensively on the lack of interoperability of EHRs. The AMA response expresses its continued support for financial incentives to support physician adoption of HIT. However, it also outlines several serious concerns with the way the MU program has been structured, and makes multiple recommendations for improving the program, including modifying the rulemaking for Stage 2 of the MU program to provide physicians with greater flexibility.
On March 21, 2013, Rep. Diane Black (R-TN) introduced H.R. 1331, the “Electronic Health Records Improvement Act,” in an effort to improve the MU program. The AMA expressed its support in a May 30 letter for the “hardship exemptions” from meaningful use financial penalties for solo practitioners and physicians near retirement contained in this legislation. AMA also expressed its belief that the legislation will help make improvements to the program by imposing a one-year limit on the back-dating of program requirements, expanding the options for participation in the incentive program, providing scope of practice exemptions, and establishing a formal penalties appeal process.
Medicare Physician Payment
As the leading force in Washington for Medicare reform, the AMA continues to advocate for replacement of the flawed Medicare physician payment formula. In this effort, the AMA is aggressively working with Congress and federal agencies to improve the Medicare program by repealing the sustainable growth rate (SGR), enacting stable, adequate annual Medicare physician payment updates, and ensuring beneficiaries’ continued access to care. The AMA has recommended to Congress a three-pronged approach to reforming the physician payment system:
- repeal the SGR;
- implement a five-year period of stable Medicare physician payments; and
- transition to an array of new payment models designed to enhance care coordination, quality, appropriateness and costs.
Recent Congressional testimony and correspondence
Mental Health Reform
In a September 30, 2013 letter to Senators Baucus and Hatch, the AMA provided input on how to improve the mental health system under the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Key to improving the mental health system is the better integration of psychiatric and medical care. Not only would better integration improve quality of care and population health and reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with psychiatric and substance abuse disorders, but it would also reduce overall health care costs. Primary care physicians are often the initial point of contact for screening, assessing, and treating mental health issues, whether during annual physicals or other scheduled appointments. However, Medicare’s traditional fee-for-service (FFS) system is a barrier to allowing psychiatrists to assist primary care physicians manage patients with depression and other mental health issues. Current Medicare policy that will not pay for consultations or team meetings imposes a barrier to the communication that is necessary among treating clinicians for effective integrated care. One way to begin to address these problems would be to start paying for non-face-to-face and care coordination services. The adoption of such a policy is one way that Medicare could begin to promote care improvements and reduce spending that physicians can achieve through participation in alternative payment models (APMs).
The AMA continues with efforts to address physician workforce shortages, including strongly supporting stable, adequate funding for graduate medical education (GME) training positions.
Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs)
On February 25, 2013, Rep. Tom Price re-introduced H.R. 805, the "Quality Improvement Organization Program Restoration Act." This bill would restore and maintain local physician involvement in Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) and keep the program state-based. The bill would also support local physician involvement in peer review.
Truth in Advertising
The AMA strongly supports H.R. 1427, the "Truth in Healthcare Marketing Act of 2013." This legislation was introduced by Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) and Rep. David Scott (D-GA) on April 9, 2013, and would help patients make informed decisions about their health care by ensuring that they have accurate information regarding the education, training, and qualifications of individuals providing their health care services. In addition, H.R. 1427 would require disclosure of health care providers' licensure in advertisements for health care services, and provide vital resources to address patient confusion in the health care marketplace.
The AMA, at its 2014 Annual Meeting, resoundingly adopted new policy that supports the provision of full health benefits to eligible veterans to ensure that they can access the medical care they need outside the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) medical centers and other facilities. This action was in response to recent disturbing reports of unconscionably long wait times and of the unacceptable, unworkable VA appointment scheduling system.
On June 9, 2014, Rep. Jeff Miller (R-FL) introduced H.R. 4810, "The Veteran Access to Care Act of 2014," which passed the House on June 10, 2014. On June 11, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced S. 2450, "The Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014," which passed the Senate as H.R. 3230, also on June 11. Congress will now work to reconcile the differences between these bi-partisan bills.
The AMA strongly advocates that Congress act to rapidly enact a bi-partisan long-term solution for timely access to entitled care for eligible veterans.
Form 1099 Information Reporting
After House and Senate passage, H.R. 4 was signed into law April 14, 2011. The law repealed an IRS 1099 reporting requirement for businesses that was included in the Affordable Care Act. The provision required businesses, including physician offices, to file a 1099 form with the IRS if the total amount of payments made to another business in exchange for goods and services was $600 or more in a year. The AMA strongly advocated for the repeal of this requirement since the stricter requirements in the provision would have created an expensive reporting burden which would have negatively impacted the operation of businesses, including physician practices.
On April 20, 2011, AMA sent a letter to Chairman Rehberg of the House Approps. Subcommittee on Labor-HHS, Education and Related Agencies sharing its views on funding priorities for various health programs under the subcommittee's jurisdiction, including those that are crucial to ensuring an adequate supply and distribution of physicians.
PDUFA/Drug Shortages/Generic Antibiotic Incentives
On June 20, the House passed S. 3187, the "Food & Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act," by voice vote. The Senate adopted the measure on June 26 by a vote of 92-4, and the President is expected to sign it into law shortly.
The final version of S. 3187, which is the result of a bipartisan compromise between the House and the Senate, would reauthorize the Prescription Drug User Fee Act and the Medical Device User Fee Act, and newly authorize user fees for generic drugs and biosimilars. It includes several provisions that the AMA supports and worked to improve throughout the legislative process. These provisions would address the drug shortage crisis, incentivize the development of new antibiotics, place various chemical substances known as "bath salts" in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, and require the Comptroller General to prepare a report on issues posed by rogue online pharmacies. Additionally, the bill omits a provision that was of significant concern to the AMA, which would have reclassified combination products containing hydrocodone from Schedule III to Schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act. While the AMA supports efforts to prevent the abuse of such products, this approach could have unintentionally limited patient access to legitimately needed pain treatment. The final bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to hold a public meeting to solicit recommendations regarding drugs containing hydrocodone.
The AMA believes that conditioning physician licensure on participation in any public or private insurance plans unduly restricts a physician's freedom to practice. The AMA is actively supporting H.R. 969, the "Medical Practice Freedom Act of 2011," introduced by Representative Tom Price (R - GA), which would ensure that physicians are not required to participate in any health plan as a condition of licensure in any state.
The AMA is a strong opponent of section 511 of the Tax Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA). Under this provision, federal, state and local government entities are required to withhold 3 percent of all payments made for services or property after December 31, 2011, including payments under the Medicare program. The AMA strongly opposes section 511 and we support repeal of this provision.
On October 27, 2011, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 674, AMA-supported legislation that prevents a planned 3% tax-withhold for many Medicare payments, by a vote of 405-16. The Senate passed this legislation on November 10 by a vote of 95 to 0.
The legislation was signed into law by President Obama on November 21, 2011 and completely repeals this provision of law and eliminates the planned withholding. The cost of this repeal was offset by a change in the definition of Medicare Adjusted Gross Income for the calculation of eligibility for Medicaid or insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. This modification was supported by a majority in Congress and the White House.
This represents a significant victory for physicians and a step forward in stabilizing the Medicare system. The additional burden of a 3% tax-withhold would have been untenable in the current Medicare payment environment.