JAMA and the BMJ Announce
The Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
September 10-12, 2009
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Printable PDF version of this program
On behalf of JAMA and the BMJ, we invite you to join us in Vancouver for the Sixth International Congress
on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. We have been planning this Congress for the last 4 years, and
we are delighted at the amount of interest it has generated.
Drummond Rennie, Congress Director
Annette Flanagin, Congress Coordinator
Fiona Godlee, European Director
Jane Smith, European Coordinator
Why Attend?
The goals of the Congress are to present new research into peer review and the other processes used to
evaluate and disseminate medical and scientific information and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness
of biomedical communications worldwide.
Who Should Attend?
Editors and publishers of biomedical and scientific peer-reviewed journals, scientists and researchers,
funders, biomedical informatics experts, librarians, biomedical writers, journalists, historians, ethicists, and
anyone else interested in the progress of the biomedical/scientific information enterprise and the quality of
biomedical/scientific information.
Thursday, September 10
7:30 AM – 8:30 AM
Registration, Coffee/Tea, and Exhibits
8:30 AM
Welcome and Introductions
Drummond Rennie (United States)
8:40 AM – 9:10 AM
Published Research: Naturally Wrong or Inflated?
John P. A. Ioannidis (Greece)
9:10 AM – 10:30 AM
Authorship and Contributorship
Moderator: Drummond Rennie (United States)
Influence of Authorship Order and Corresponding Author on Perceptions of Authors’ Contributions
Mohit Bhandari, Jason Busse, Abhaya Kulkarni, PJ Devereaux, Leece Pamela, Sohail Bajammal, Gordon Guyatt (Canada)
Ghost Writers and Honorary Authorship: A Survey From the Chinese Medical Journal
Shou-chu QIAN, Xiu-yuan HAO, Su-ning YOU, Mou-yue WANG (China)
Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in 6 General Medical Journals, 2009
Joseph Wislar, Annette Flanagin, Phil Fontanarosa, Catherine DeAngelis (United States)
Ghost Writing: How Some Journals Aided and Abetted the Marketing of a Drug
Lisa Bero, Jenny White (United States)
10:30 AM – 11:00 AM
Refreshment Break and Visit Exhibits
11:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Peer Review
Moderator: James Scott (United States)
The Natural History of Peer Reviewers: The Decay of Quality
Michael Callaham (United States)
Does a Mentoring Program for New Peer Reviewers Improve Their Review Quality? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Debra Houry, Michael Callaham, Steven Green (United States)
Surveys of Current Status in Biomedical Science Grant Review: Funding Organizations' and Grant Reviewers' Perspectives
Sara Schroter, Trish Groves, Liselotte Hojgaard (United Kingdom, Denmark)
12:00 PM – 1:30 PM
Lunch and Visit Exhibits
1:30 PM – 3:10 PM
Data Sharing and Conflicts of Interest
Moderator: Martin Van Der Weyden (Australia)
Reproducible Research: Biomedical Researchers’ Willingness to Share Information to Enable Others to Reproduce Their Results
Christine Laine, Michael Berkwits, Cynthia Mulrow, Mary Beth Schaeffer, Michael Griswold, Steven Goodman (United States)
Investigator Experiences With Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Trials
Paula A. Rochon, Melanie Sekeres, John Hoey, Joel Lexchin, Lorraine E. Ferris, David Moher, Wei Wu, Sunila R. Kalkar, Marleen Van Laethem, Andrea Gruneir, Jennifer Gold, M. James Maskalyk, David L. Streiner, An-Wen Chan (Canada)
Acknowledgment of Company Support in Research Publications From Investigator-Sponsored Studies
John Ellison, Rosarito Jahn, Kirsten Kempe (United States)
Commercial Relationships, Funding, and Full Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials Initially Reported in Conference Abstracts
Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer, Bonnielin Swenor, Roberta Scherer, Kay Dickersin (United States)
Perceptions and Integration of Conflict of Interest Disclosures Among Peer Reviewers
Suzanne Lippert, Michael Callaham, Bernard Lo (United States)
3:10 PM – 3:45 PM
Refreshment Break and Visit Exhibits
3:45 PM – 5:25 PM
Editorial Training, Decisions, Policies, and Ethics
Moderator: Edward Campion (United States)
Background, Training, and Familiarity With Ethical Standards of Editors of Major Medical Journals
Victoria Wong, Michael Callaham (United States)
A Qualitative Study of Editorial Decisions About Publication of Randomized Trials at Major Biomedical Journals
Kirby Lee, Elizabeth Boyd, Lisa Bero (United States)
Editorial Policies of Pediatric Journals: A Survey of Instructions for Authors
Joerg Meerpohl, Robert Wolff, Charlotte Niemeyer, Gerd Antes, Erik von Elm (Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland)
Did JAMA’s Requirement for Independent Statistical Analysis Affect the Number of Industry-Funded Studies It Published?
Elizabeth Wager, Rahul Mhaskar, Stephanie Warburton, Benjamin Djulbegovic (United Kingdom, United States)
What Ethical Issues Do Journal Editors Bring to COPE?
Elizabeth Wager, Sabine Kleinert (United Kingdom)
6:30 PM
Welcome Reception
Friday, September 11
7:30 AM – 8:30 AM
Registration, Coffee/Tea, and Exhibits
8:30 AM – 9:00 AM
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Harold C. Sox Jr (United States)
9:00 AM – 10:20 AM
Publication Pathways
Moderator: Annette Flanagin (United States)
Predictors of Time to Publication of Manuscripts Rejected by Major Biomedical Journals
Kirby Lee, Nicholas Lehman, I’Alla Brodie, Lisa Bero (United States)
Publication of Research Reports After Rejection by the New England Journal of Medicine in 2 Time Periods
Michael Bretthauer, Pam Miller, Edward W. Campion, Jeff Drazen (United States)
An Evaluation of Time-to-Publication for Randomized Trials Submitted to the BMJ
Sara Schroter, Douglas Altman, John Ioannidis (United Kingdom, Greece)
Complexity of Peer Review Evaluations: Twelve-Year Prospective Study on 424 Submitted Papers to a Specialized Journal
Francine Kauffmann, Klaus Rabe, Béatrice Faraldo, Hélčne Tharrault, Jean Maccario, Alan Leff (France, the Netherlands, United States)
10:20 AM – 11:00 AM
Refreshment Break and Visit Exhibits
11:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Publication Bias
Moderator: Lisa Bero (United States)
Positive-Outcome Bias Is Present in Peer Review: An Experimental Study
Seth Leopold, Wendy Emerson, Richard Brand, James Heckman, Winston Warme, Fredric Wolf (United States)
Composite Outcomes Exaggerate the Benefit of Interventions in Randomized Trials
Peter Gřtzsche, Gloria Cordoba, Lisa Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Harold Bae (Denmark, United States)
A Potent Mix: Reporting Biases and Publication Strategy for Off-Label Indications
S. Swaroop Vedula, Ilyas Rona, Palko Goldman, Thomas Greene, Kay Dickersin (United States)
12:00 PM – 1:30 PM
Lunch and Visit Exhibits
1:30 PM – 2:30 PM
Rhetoric
Moderator: Richard Horton (United Kingdom)
“Spin” in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials With Nonstatistically Significant Primary Outcomes
Isabelle Boutron, Susan Dutton, Philippe Ravaud, Douglas Altman (United Kingdom, France)
Rhetoric Used in Reporting Research Results
Lisa Bero, Yolanda Cheng (United States)
A Propaganda Index for Screening Manuscripts
Eileen Gambrill (United States)
2:30 PM – 3:45 PM
Poster Sessions and Refreshments and Visit Exhibits
(See poster session listing for details.)
3:45 PM – 5:05 PM
Trial Registration
Moderator: Catherine DeAngelis (United States)
Correspondence Between ClinicalTrials.gov Registrations and Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
Deborah Zarin, Tony Tse, Rebecca Williams (United States)
Trial Registration Can Be a Useful Source of Information for Quality Assessment: A Study of Trials Records Retrieved From the WHO Search Portal
Ludovic Reveiz, An-Wen Chan, Karmela Krleza-Jeric, Carlos Granados, Pinart Mariona, Itziar Etxeandia, Diego Rada, Monserrat Martinez, Andres Cardona (Colombia, United States, Canada, Spain)
Registration Completeness and Changes of Registered Data in Clinicaltrials.gov for Clinical Trials Published in ICMJE Journals After September 2005 Deadline for Mandatory Trial Registration
Ana Marusic, Mirjana Huic, Matko Marusic (Croatia)
Is Protocol Information Recorded in Clinicaltrials.gov Useful for Systematic Reviewers Relying on Conference Abstracts?
Roberta Scherer, Ann-Margret Ervin, JaKeisha Taylor, Kay Dickersin (United States)
Saturday, September 12
7:30 AM – 8:30 AM
Registration, Coffee/Tea, and Exhibits
8:30 AM – 9:00 AM
Peer Review Congresses, 1986 to 2009: Victory? Defeat? Both?
Drummond Rennie (United States)
9:00 AM – 10:00 AM
Quality of Reporting I
Moderator: Dan J. Ncayiyana (South Africa)
Quality of Survey Reporting in High-Impact-Factor Journals
Carol Bennett, Sara Khangura, Jamie Brehaut, Ian Graham, David Moher, Beth Potter, Jeremy Grimshaw (Canada)
Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Clinical Trials
Karen Robinson, Steven Goodman (United States)
Utility of Commentaries That Accompany Publication of Research Studies
Diane Civic (United States)
10:00 AM – 11:00 AM
Poster Sessions and Refreshments and Visit Exhibits
(See poster session listing for details.)
11:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Quality of Reporting II
Moderator: Douglas Altman (United Kingdom)
Acknowledging Limitations in Biomedical Studies: The ALIBI study
Milo Puhan, Nadine Heller, Irena Joleska, Lara Siebeling, Patrick Muggensturm, Martin Umbehr, Steven Goodman, Gerben ter Riet (United States, Switzerland, the Netherlands)
Reporting of Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Trials: Comparison Between Trial Protocols and Journal Articles
Anette Blümle, Erik von Elm, Joerg Meerpohl (Germany, Switzerland)
Reporting of Continuous Outcome Measures in Randomized Clinical Trials: Is the Whole Story Being Told?
David Schriger, Dan Savage, Douglas Altman (United States, United Kingdom)
12:00 PM – 1:30 PM
Lunch and Visit Exhibits
1:30 PM – 2:30 PM
Quality of Reporting III
Moderator: Paul Hebert (Canada)
CONSORT for Improving the Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials: A Longitudinal Study of PubMed-Indexed Articles
Sally Hopewell, Susan Dutton, Ly-mee Yu, An-Wen Chan, Douglas Altman (United Kingdom, Canada)
Reporting Clinical Trial Subgroup Analyses: A Proposal for Rigorously Assessing Heterogeneity in Treatments Effects
David Kent, Peter Rothwell, John Ioannidis, Douglas Altman, Rodney Hayward (United States, United Kingdom, Greece)
Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Research: A Systematic Review
David Moher (Canada)
2:30 PM – 3:00 PM
Refreshment Break
3:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Postpublication Citations, Indexing, Responses, and Online Publishing
Moderator: Fiona Godlee (United Kingdom)
Impact Factors of Secondary Journals
Cynthia Lokker, R. Brian Haynes, K. Ann McKibbon, Nancy Wilczynski (Canada)
Indexation of Anesthesia Journals in MEDLINE and EMBASE
Martin Tramčr, Nadia Elia, Jean-Daniel Junod, Teresa Dib, Christian Mazza (Switzerland)
Authors’ Response to Substantive Criticism in Letters to the Editor
Peter Gřtzsche, Tony Delamothe, Fiona Godlee, Andreas Lundh (Denmark, United Kingdom)
Reader Response to an Online Clinical-Decision Feature With Polls and Commenting
Patricia Kritek, Edward W. Campion, Pam Miller (United States)
Use of the World Wide Web by Journals, 2003-2009: A Longitudinal Observational Study
David Schriger, Rashida Merchant, Ariana Chehrazi, Douglas Altman (United States, United Kingdom)
5:00 PM
Summary and Adjournment
Drummond Rennie (United States)
Abstracts to Be Presented as Posters
Posters will be presented during 2 sessions on Friday and Saturday, September 11 and 12.
Advertising
A Survey on Publication Standards of Medical Drug and Device Advertisements Published in Core Medical Journals in China
Youping LI, Liang DU, Yao-long CHEN, Min CHEN (China)
Papers Supporting Advertisements in Medical Journals: A Continuation of the Case-Control Study
Vasiliy Vlassov (Russia)
Authorship and Contributorship
Factors Associated With Multiple Authorship in Peer-Reviewed Papers Regarding Pregnancy Over 3 Decades
Brian Mercer, Catherine Spong, James Scott (United States)
Bias
The Value of Lesser Impact Factor Surgical Journals as a Source of Negative and Inconclusive Outcomes Reporting
Ziad Kanaan, Susan Galandiuk, Margaret Abby, Katherine Shannon, Daoud Dajani, Hiram C. Polk (United States)
Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender
Deborah Wing, Rebecca Benner, Rita Petersen, James Scott (United States)
Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials of Acutely Ill and Hospitalized Patients With Acute Lung Injury or Sepsis
Chris Lazongas, Andrew Toren, Ruxandra Pinto, Niall Ferguson, Robert Fowler (Canada)
Multiple Publication of Positive vs Negative Trial Results in Review Articles: Influence on Apparent Weight of the Evidence
Erick Turner (United States)
Reasons for Not Publishing Studies: A Meta-analysis of Data From Empirical Studies
Fujian Song, Caroline Hing, Sheetal Parekh, L Hooper, Yoon Loke, Jon Ryder, Alex Sutton, Ian Harvey (United Kingdom)
Citation Analysis
Bibliometric Analysis of Latin American Presence in Pediatric Publications: Geographical Distribution and Countries’ Impact Factor
Paula Otero, Norma Rossato, Pablo Duran, Fernando Ferrero, Hebe Gonzalez Pena, Susana Rodriguez, Jose Ceriani Cernadas (Argentina)
Demographics and Intellectual Market Share of Medical Journals
Victoria Wong, Michael Callaham (United States)
Conflicts of Interest
Sponsorship of Medical Textbooks by Drug or Device Companies
Peter Gřtzsche, Andreas Lundh (Denmark)
Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Policies in Psychiatry and Medicine: A Comparative Study of Peer-Reviewed Journals
Gauri Khurana, Schuyler Henderson, Garry Walters, Andres Martin (United States, Australia)
Impact of Disclosing Financial Ties in Research and Care: A Systematic Review
Adam Licurse, Emma Barber, Steven Joffe, Cary Gross (United States)
Screening Investigator Financial Conflict of Interest: A Checklist for Authors, Editors, and Readers
David Moher, Paula Rochon, John Hoey, An-Wen Chan, Lorraine Ferris, Joel Lexchin, Marleen Van Laethem, Sunila Kalkar, Melanie Sekeres, Wei Wu, Andrea Gruneir (Canada, United States)
Data Sharing
Medical Journal Editor Perspectives on Sharing Results Data From Patient-Oriented Research: A WAME Survey
Karmela Krleza-Jeric, Ida Sim, Ana Marusic, Ludovic Reveiz, Carlos Granados (Canada, United States, Croatia, Colombia)
Editorial Decision Process
Consistency of Decision Making by Editors: The Relation Between Reviewers’ and Editors’ Ratings and Future (10 Years) Citation
Tobias Opthof, Ruben Coronel (the Netherlands)
Evaluation of Editor’s Judgment on Quality of Articles
Heidi Logothetti, Sheryl Martin, Rebecca Benner, James Scott, John Queenan, Catherine Spong (United States)
Subjectivity and the Science of Peer Review: What Qualitative Research Can Tell Us About Editorial Processes at Major Medical Journals
Wendy Lipworth (Australia)
Ethical Concerns
Informed Consent in Clinical Studies Published in the Chinese Medical Journal: Comparison of 2001-2004 and 2005-2008
Mouyue WANG (China)
Ethical Concerns of Nursing Journal Reviewers: An International Survey
Marion Broome, Molly Dougherty, Margaret Freda, Margaret Kearney, Judith Baggs (United States)
Must Research Using Publicly Available Anonymous Databases Undergo IRB Review? Views From Journals and IRBs
Ingrid Nygaard, Sheryl Martin (United States)
Ethics Committee Review Requirements for Published Abstracts of Human Research Presented at Major Medical Association Meetings
Robert Dellavalle, Rachel Simmons (United States)
Funding/Grant Peer Review
Quality Assurance of Grant Applications: Confirmation of Publication Records
Liza Chan, Kathryn Graham, Pam Valentine, Jacques Magnan (Canada)
Instructions for Authors
Completeness of Journal Instructions for Authors
Jane C. Wiggs (United States)
High Impact Factor Journals Offer Limited Guidance to Authors Reporting Survey Research
Sara Khangura, Carol Bennett, Jamie Brehaut, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Moher, Beth Potter (Canada)
Open Access
Impact of Free Access of Articles on Content and Impact Factor of an Indian Biomedical Journal
Anju Sharma, Satyanarayana Kanikaram (India)
Peer Review
ET Study: Enhancing Transparency of Biomedical Journals
Erik Cobo, Agusti Urrutia, Albert Selva-O’Callagham, Francesc Cardellach, Josep Maria Ribera, Jordi Cortes, Francesc Miras, Celestino Rey-Joly, Miquel Vilardell-Tarres (Spain)
Diversity and Quality of Reviews for a Generalist Medical Journal
William Phillips, Robin Gotler, Laura McLellan, Stephen Zyzanski (United States)
Implementation of a Medical Journal Peer Reviewer Stratification System Based on Quality and Reliability
Steven Green, Michael Callaham (United States)
Assessment of Reviewers Recommended by Authors vs Editors: Is There Bias?
Monica Helton, William Balistreri (United States)
Peer Review in Journals Published by Oxford Journals
Huw Price (United Kingdom)
Quality of Peer Reviews in 3 Nursing Journals From the Perspective of Authors and Editors
Sandra Thomas, Mona Shattell, Peggy Chinn, W. Cowling (United States)
Nursing Journal Peer Reviewers’ Views on Quality Indicators in Publishing
Molly Dougherty, Margaret Freda, Margaret Kearney, Judith Baggs, Marion Broome (United States)
Peer Review in Small vs Non-Small Biomedical Journals
Farrokh Habibzadeh, Rob Siebers (Iran, New Zealand)
Effects of Training Reviewers on Quality of Peer Review: A Retrospective Survey
Ying YANG (China)
Peer Reviewers’ Recommendations at the Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2004-2008: Style or Substance?
Richard Kravitz, Peter Franks, Martha Gerrity, Mitchell Feldman, Cindy Byrne, William Tierney (United States)
Trends in Using Insecure e-Mail Services in Communication With Journal Editors
Krešimir Šolic, Vesna Ilakovac, Ana Marusic, Matko Marusic (Croatia)
Postpublication Perceptions and Influence
Canadian Physicians’ Perceptions About Biomedical Journals
Erica Frank, Carolina Segura (Canada)
The Influence of the Impact Factor on Discussions Between Doctors and Their Patients: The Case of Rosiglitazone
Jim Nuovo (United States)
Publishing Models
Transformation of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology From a Traditional Format to a New Format
Thomas Garite (United States)
A New Journal Mode: Public Peer Review, Open Access on Web 2.0
Xibin SHEN (China)
Publication Pathway
What Happens to Rejected Manuscripts?
Kenneth Noller, Sheryl Martin, James Scott (United States)
Submission and Peer Review Frequencies Before Acceptance: An Analysis of Submissions by an Academic Medical Center
Colleen Sauber, LeAnn Stee, Sarah Jenkins, Margery Lovejoy (United States)
Quality of the Literature
Evolution of Thoracic Surgical Literature
Maurice Blitz, Andrew Graham, Sean McFadden, Sean Grondin, Gary Gelfand (United States, Canada)
Pharmacovigilance and “Local” Literature: The Italian Bibliography
Claudio Oliveri, Daniela Ranzani (Italy)
Quality of Online Information
Multilayer Quality Control for Publications and Online Lectures
Faina Linkov, Gilbert Omenn, Ismail Serageldin, Vinton Cerf, Ronald LaPorte (United States, Egypt)
Citations to Web Sites in Scientific Papers: The Permanence of Native and Archived References
Andrea Thorp, David Schriger (United States)
Understanding Why the US National Library of Medicine Fails to Properly Index the Publication Type of a Meaningful Number of Randomized Controlled Trials
Susan Wieland, Kay Dickersin (United States)
Quality of Reporting
Quality Review of Clinical Guidelines
Anne Hilde Rosvik, Trond Bjornerud, Espen Movik, Magne Nylenna (Norway)
Development of Clinical Guidelines in Norway: Do Patients Participate?
Anne Hilde Rosvik, Trond Bjornerud, Espen Movik, Magne Nylenna (Norway)
Variability of Standards for Reporting Tumor-Graft Data in Preclinical Cancer Therapeutic Studies
Nilofer Azad, Adam Pascoe, Elizabeth Sugar, Scott Kern (United States)
Challenges in Peer Reviewing Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Do We Know the Degree to Which the Guidelines Reflect Underlying Evidence?
Tianjing Li, Roberta Scherer, Elizabeth Ssemanda, Ann-Margret Ervin, Kay Dickersin (United States)
Reporting Guidelines for Surveys: Limited Guidance and Little Adherence
Carol Bennett, Sara Khangura, Jamie Brehaut, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Moher, Beth Potter (Canada)
Publication of Methods in Focus Group Research: Are There Quality Standards for Qualitative Research?
Chima Ndumele, Genna Ableman, Beverly Russell, Edith Gurrola, LeRoi Hicks (United States)
Citing the CONSORT Statement and Explanation and Elaboration Paper: What’s It All About?
David Moher, Mary Ocampo, Kenneth Schulz, Sally Hopewell, Douglas Altman (Canada, United States, United Kingdom)
Inconsistent and Incompletely Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials of Kidney Transplantation
Angela Webster, Lorenn Ruster, Alistair Merrifield, Gail Higgins, Daniel Owers, Jonathan Craig (Australia)
Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Chinese Medical Journal From 2007 to 2008
Jing SUN, Kun HAN, Shou-chu QIAN, Su-ning YOU (China)
CONSORT Guidelines for Reporting Abstracts of Randomized Trials: A Survey of Its Impact on High Impact Journals
Sally Hopewell, Isabelle Boutron, Mike Clarke (United Kingdom, France)
The SPIRIT Initiative: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials
An-Wen Chan, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas Altman, Peter Gotzsche, Asbjorn Hrobjartsson, Karmela Krleza-Jeric, Andreas Laupacis, David Moher (United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Denmark)
Application of Item Response Theory to Manuscript Rating Scales
Brian Budgell, Takeo Nakayama (Canada, Japan)
The Null Hypothesis Significance Test in Health Sciences Research (1995-2006): Statistical Analysis and Interpretation
Luis Silva, Patricio Suarez, Ana Fernandez, Vanesa Alvarez, Tania Iglesias (Cuba, Spain)
Retractions
Why and How Do Journals Retract Articles?
Elizabeth Wager, Peter Williams (United Kingdom)
Round Up the Usual Suspects? Involvement of Medical Writers and the Pharmaceutical Industry in Retracted Publications
Karen Woolley, Mark Woolley, Rebecca Lew, Narelle Bramich, Julie Ely, Serina Stretton, Julie Monk, Janelle Keys (Australia)
Training
A Survey of Past Participants in the Annals of Emergency Medicine Editorial Board Fellowship Program
Teri Reynolds, Michael Callaham (United States)
Trial Registration
Association of Trial Registration With the Results and Conclusions of Published Trials of New Oncology Drugs
Nicolas Rasmussen, Kirby Lee, Lisa Bero (United States)
Characterizing Sponsor-Imposed Restrictions on Disclosing Results of Clinical Trials
Tony Tse, Deborah Zarin (United States)
