PROFESSIONAMA meeting: Doctors who give disaster aid seek liability shieldDelegates push for legislative changes requiring plaintiffs to show malicious intent.By Amy Lynn Sorrel, amednews staff. July 16, 2007. Annual Meeting 2007
Chicago -- The AMA House of Delegates wants to bolster civil and criminal liability protections for physicians assisting during officially declared disasters or emergencies. The move would let doctors answer the call for help without fearing their medical judgment will be questioned. A patchwork of federal and state laws immunize volunteer doctors from liability for certain negligence that might occur while treating patients in catastrophic situations, according to a Board of Trustees report presented at the Annual Meeting. Those laws typically do not cover misconduct, and there is no protection from criminal charges. Delegates voted to have the AMA develop and give to state medical societies model legislation that would automatically shield eligible doctors -- whether they volunteer or already work in the area -- from civil and criminal liability when they are treating patients in response to a declared disaster. The AMA also will push to enhance existing laws by replacing the traditional negligence standard with one requiring plaintiffs to show that bad faith, malice or deliberate intent to harm a patient was involved. "[Liability protection] should never be a question when people need help and have help available," said AMA board Trustee William A. Hazel Jr., MD. A case brought in the Hurricane Katrina aftermath has raised concerns that doctors might think twice about volunteering in disaster situations, knowing they could face criminal charges for their decisions. The Louisiana attorney general is investigating New Orleans otolaryngologist Anna Maria Pou, MD, and two nurses for allegedly killing patients with lethal doses of pain drugs. Dr. Pou and the nurses deny the allegations. In extraordinary emergencies, "normal procedures are not available to doctors and they are left only with their good-faith judgment," Dr. Pou's lawyer, Richard T. Simmons Jr., said at the AMA meeting. No formal charges have been filed against Dr. Pou. But faced with defending possible criminal and civil charges, Simmons said he found no guidelines on how to address the case in the context of a disaster. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Meeting Notes: Other actionsIssue: Apologizing to patients for unexpected outcomes could improve physician-patient communication and help reduce lawsuits.
Issue: Physicians are frustrated that antitrust laws put them at a disadvantage when negotiating payment contracts with a consolidated managed care industry.
Issue: New AMA leadership
Issue: AMA 2006 finances
Issue: AMA membership dues
Copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
|