• Government
• Profession
• Business
• Opinion
• Health

• Health reform
• H1N1
• P4P
• EMRs
• Medicare
• Liability
• AMA House
• » More

• Book Excerpt
• Business Pitch
• Meetings
• » More

• Contract Language
• Ethics Forum
• In the Courts
• Practice Management
• Technically Speaking
• » More

• Issue dates
• Regions
• Health plans
• Sections
• News briefs
• Columns
• Editorials
• Letters
• Writers
• Other years

• Search tips
• E-mail alert
• Radio
• RSS
• Mobile
• Subscribe
• Institutions
• Staff directory
• Advertising
• Permissions
• Reprints
• News media
• Site guide
• Useful links
• About
• Premium
• Contact

Premera seeks for-profit status

The Washington state insurer has tried since 2002 to convert from a nonprofit but has not gotten insurance department approval.

By Jonathan G. Bethely, amednews staff. Nov. 28, 2005.

• PRINT|
• E-MAIL|
• RESPOND|
• REPRINTS|
• SHARE

Premera Blue Cross, Washington state's oldest and largest nonprofit health insurer, is taking yet another step in its attempt to become a for-profit company.

Lawyers for Premera argued in the Washington Court of Appeals Nov. 7 to reverse a July 2004 ruling by Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, who blocked Premera's conversion plan.

Kreidler said the conversion would negatively impact both Premera consumers and the general public.

Premera spokesman Scott Forslund said Kreidler had exceeded his authority under the state holding company act and that the decision did not meet requirements under the law.

Kreidler's rejection maintains that Premera's conversion could lead to less spending on medical care and higher premiums, especially in remote areas of eastern Washington, where Premera has a significant market share. But Forslund said experts had testified in public meetings that premiums would not increase at a higher rate and that physician reimbursements most likely would not be affected.

Rather than file the appeal in Washington's Superior Court, Premera and state officials agreed last year to take up the fight in the Court of Appeals, where the case likely would have ended up after being heard in a lower court. The Washington Court of Appeals is expected to rule on the case within the a year.