AMA



Press the print button on your browser.
Click here to return to the previous page.

Certificate of Need


  • Gilbert v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Gilbert v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. Ct. App.)

Issue

The issue in this case is whether an MRI clinic should be considered a physician’s office under the Kentucky Certificate of Need (CON) law.

AMA interest

The AMA believes that CON laws should not be extended to physician-owned offices.

Case summary

This case is an appeal of an administrative order, which found that a physician and his wholly owned corporation had failed to obtain a CON before opening three MRI facilities.  The physician contends that the facilities are a part of his private office, and he therefore falls within a statutory exemption to the CON law.

Dr. Gilbert first appealed to the Franklin County Circuit Court, but the court affirmed the administrative decision, deferring to the agency’s factual determinations and legal conclusions.  Dr. Gilbert has now appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.

Litigation Center involvement

The Litigation Center, along with the Kentucky Medical Association, filed a memorandum of law on Dr. Gilbert’s behalf in the Franklin County Circuit Court.  The Kentucky Court of Appeals denied leave to the Kentucky Medical Association and the AMA to file an amicus curiae brief.

Last updated: Jan 29, 2008
Content provided by: Office of the General Counsel


Privacy Statement | Advertise with us
Copyright 1995-2008 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.