DoctorFinder | Join/Renew | MyAMA | Site Map | Contact Us

Toolkit field testing

e-mail story | print story
The Ethical Force Program's organizational assessment toolkit on patient centered communication: Phase I of field testing is complete, Phase II underway

Communicating with diverse patient populations is a growing challenge for American health care organizations. It is important that organizations meet this challenge and always strive for effective communication to maintain safety, respect for patients and informed consent in health care.

In phase I of field testing, The Ethical Force Program (led by the Institute for Ethics at the American Medical Association) selected sixteen hospitals and health centers to help develop and field test a self-assessment toolkit on the topic of patient-centered communication. In phase II, testing continues in nine sites, which will use the assessment results to inform quality improvement interventions.

The goal of the self-assessment toolkit is to help hospitals and physician practices perform an organizational self-assessment to determine how well they communicate with diverse patient populations. The toolkit focuses on those populations that are at risk of poor health outcomes because of vulnerability to ineffective communication during encounters with the health care system. Patients who may be most at risk of ineffective communication are those who speak limited or no English, those from minority cultural groups who may not share "mainstream" health beliefs and values, and those with low health literacy.

Participating hospitals include:

  • Children's Hospital and Research Center, Oakland, Calif. (Phase I, II)
  • George Washington University Hospital, Washington, D.C. (Phase I)
  • North Broward Hospital District, Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (Phase I)
  • Sierra Kings District Hospital, Reedley, Calif. (Phase I, II)
  • The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill. (Phase I, II)
  • University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kans. (Phase I)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss. (Phase I, II)
  • Windham Hospital, Willimantic, Conn. (Phase I, II)

Participating health centers include:

  • Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Conn. (Phase I, II)
  • Family HealthCare Network, Visalia, Calif. (Phase I)
  • Geisinger Medical Group, Mount Pocono, Pa. (Phase I, II)
  • Golden Valley Health Centers, Merced, Calif. (Phase I, II)
  • Hennepin Faculty Associates at Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn. (Phase I)
  • Louisville Oncology, Louisville, Ky. (Phase I)
  • Open Door Family Medical Center, Ossining, N.Y. (Phase I)
  • Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio (Phase I, II)

The sites were selected based on organization size and type, patient population diversity and region served. The selection committee tried to include small and large organizations, that are for-profit and not-for-profit, teaching and non-teaching, and located in urban, suburban, and rural locations. The diversity of selected organizations is important because the field testing process will develop and refine the patient-centered communication self-assessment toolkit so that it will become a valuable resource for a wide range of health care organizations.

All selected organizations will:

  • Use the toolkit at no cost
  • Receive a comprehensive report on their assessment results from Ethical Force Program staff-who during the field test stage will be providing independent data entry and analysis.
  • Collaborate with a research team and hospitals and physician practices across the country, share insights, and learn from what others are doing.
  • Evaluate their organization's commitment to communicating effectively with all patient groups.
  • Receive a small grant to cover the costs of field testing.

The Ethical Force Program is conducting this initiative in collaboration with the Health Research and Educational Trust, the American Hospital Association's research and education affiliate, with funding from The California Endowment, the Connecticut Health Foundation and the American Medical Association Foundation.

Last updated:Feb 01, 2008
Content provided by: Institute for Ethics