• A
  • |
  • A
  • Text size

Council On Ethical And Judicial Affairs Open Forum

In conformity with Resolution 14 (I-94), which requires the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA) to "conduct an Open Forum at all future meetings for the purpose of discussing pending ethical opinion issues," the 2015 Annual Meeting Open Forum will be held:

Monday, June 8, 2015
9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.
Hyatt Regency Chicago, Regency C
Chicago, IL

The Open Forum is open to all AMA members, interested non-members, other guests, and the press.

New Proposed Issues

Open Forum attendees are invited to introduce emerging ethical issues that may warrant attention from CEJA and inclusion in the AMA "Code of Medical Ethics."

Investigating Your Patients Online

Googling one’s patients or otherwise investigating them online through social media or other channels, is an area where medical professionals may need guidance. There are instances where doing so may be inappropriate or ethically required, depending on the purpose of the search. Often, patient safety plays some part in considering whether or not a search is appropriate. This discussion will allow participants to engage with CEJA on this important topic. 

Relevant Principles of Medical Ethics:
Principles: IV, VIII.

Relevant Literature:
Baker MJ, George DR and Kaufman GL. “Navigating the Google Blind Spot: An Emerging Need for Professional Guidelines to Address Patient-Targeted Googling.” J Gen Intern Med. 2014;30(1):6-7..

Cultural Competence & Communication
While formal education in cultural competence in medicine has progressed in recent years, there is still a long way to go. Clinicians require communication and critical thinking skills that allow them to consider how such variables as race, glass, gender and ethnicity are shaped by not only the patient, but themselves, as well as the larger structural context in which medicine is practiced

Relevant Principles of Medical Ethics:
Principles: I, VIII, IX.

Relevant Literature:
Metzl JM and Hansen H. “Structural Competency: Theorizing a New Medical Engagement with Stigma and Inequality.” Social Sci & Med. 2013;103:126-133.

Metzl JM, and Roberts, DE. “Structural Competency Meets Structural Racism: Race, Politics, and the Structure of Medical Knowledge.” AMA Journal of Ethics. 2014;16(9):674-690.

 

Procedural Guidelines

A member of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs will briefly present each topic on the agenda. After an issue has been introduced, the audience will be invited to discuss, with the Council, the ethical and professional considerations most relevant to the development of ethical guidelines on the topic at hand. In addition, the Council will collect written testimony for consideration at the time of the Open Forum or prior to it. Advance written testimony can be submitted to the Council staff, by e-mail at danielle.hahn@ama-assn.org or by fax at (312) 464-4799. Written testimony submitted to the Council will be given the same consideration as if it had been delivered orally.

Any member of the Association is privileged to speak on agenda items. Members should be mindful to disclose any conflict of interest that may influence their testimony. All other individuals should request from the Chair the privilege to provide oral testimony, indicating their identity and affiliation. Such a request will be honored upon approval of the Chair. Due to time constraints or other considerations, however, the Chair may not approve such requests.

All commentary should directly relate to the AMA Principles of Medical Ethics:

I. A physician shall be dedicated to providing competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.

II. A physician shall uphold the standards of professionalism, be honest in all professional interactions, and strive to report physicians deficient in character or competence, or engaging in fraud or deception, to appropriate entities.

III. A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements, which are contrary to the best interests of the patient.

IV. A physician shall respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidences and privacy within the constraints of the law.

V. A physician shall continue to study, apply, and advance scientific knowledge, maintain a commitment to medical education, make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public, obtain consultation, and use the talents of other health professionals when indicated.

VI. A physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the environment in which to provide medical care.

VII. A physician shall recognize a responsibility to participate in activities contributing to the improvement of the community and the betterment of public health.

VIII. A physician shall, while caring for a patient, regard responsibility to the patient as paramount.

IX. A physician shall support access to medical care for all people.

The Chair may establish rules on the presentation of testimony with respect to time constraints, repetitive statements, etc. The Chair also has the authority to prohibit photography, filming, and audio or video recording if the Chair feels that such factors would be undesirable for the orderly conduct of the meeting. Adherence to these guidelines will ensure that the forum runs smoothly and that the results are satisfactory to all.

Disclosure. The content of this activity does not relate to any product of a commercial interest as defined by the ACCME; therefore, there are no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Learning Objectives

  • Identify areas in which investigating a patient online may be ethically appropriate.
  • Describe the ethical arguments for and against investigating patients online.
  • Recognize why cultural competence in the practice of medicine is important to patient safety.
  • Examine their own level of cultural competence.
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.